🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved positions for Indigenous council members on NZ local authorities will be cut by more than half, following a divisive legislative amendment that required municipal councils to submit the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which may have multiple elected officials depending on demographic data, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a assured Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments were only able to establish a Māori ward by first putting it to a community referendum in their region. Communities often spent years generating community backing and urging their councils to create Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To address this concern, the former administration permitted local councils to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a public vote.

However, this year, the current administration reversed the change, saying local residents should decide whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation required councils that had established a ward under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes alongside the local body elections, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the referendum, 17 decided to retain their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas against reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes provided “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Opposition parties however have condemned the government’s law change as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the coalition government has implemented sweeping rollbacks to policies intended to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has said it wants to terminate “ethnic-specific” approaches, and asserts it is dedicated to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

The results of the public votes were split down urban-rural lines – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums backed Māori wards, while rural regions skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

This year’s local government elections recorded the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with under one-third of citizens participating, leading to demands for reform.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are able to create different electoral districts – such as rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The different conditions placed on Indigenous representation indicated the government was targeting Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement concerned the 17 regions that voted to retain their wards.