🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “total contradiction” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the country’s government ministers requests measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The corporation is pursuing changes to a pending law that include lowering the suggested dimensions of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on scented cigarette varieties, and watered-down penalties for any companies violating the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“Were I in government, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said the health advocate.

Thousands of residents a year die from tobacco-related illnesses, according to WHO calculations.

The campaigner stated the letter was known to have been circulated to various ministerial offices and was in circulation among community advocacy networks.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

It comes amid expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with public health regulations. Last month, international health experts sounded an alarm that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“Evidence exists of business advocacy everywhere. Corporate signatures are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN summit conference,” said Jorge Alday.

Potential consequences

“When public health regulation fails to be approved because of this letter, the price could be paid in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and requiring that visual health alerts cover 75% of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be decreased to less than half “according to global guideline limits”, postponed for minimum 12 months after the bill passes.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a warning should cover at least 50% of the cigarette package face “and attempt to encompass as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings must cover 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

BAT asks for the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would drive users to “illegally traded” products. The corporation recommends restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The proposed legislation recommends punishments for different infractions “ranging from a fraction of annual sales to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Corporate defense

Through correspondence, the managing director of the African subsidiary states the firm is “committed to responsible corporate conduct” and “endorses the aims of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “some regulations can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “undermine this law so much that the impact needed for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that numerous similar measures were present in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “complete contradiction”, he stated.

“We live in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and collect the yield and sell it out – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to benefit personally and all the subsequent offspring while my community's youth are dying … is in itself complete moral collapse.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had not resulted in corporate closures, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Official corporate statement

The company representative commented: “The company operates its activities following with relevant national regulations. Further, the company participates in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the appropriate structures which allow for stakeholder participation in policymaking.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, the spokesperson stated, adding that minors should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to accomplish desired population health targets, while accepting the variety of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” the representative explained, mentioning that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the local commercial environment and smoking product business, which encompasses rising levels of black market activity”.

The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was solicited for statement.