🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration is no longer a fundamental right. Rather, it has become a privilege that those in power grant or deny at their discretion. This represents the underlying meaning of proposed measures that the ruling administration is advancing, which would determine when and where protests can occur, with possible prison sentences for those who defy these limitations.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Earlier administrations had already undermined this fundamental freedom: the former Conservative government had given law enforcement sweeping new authorities, which international human rights organizations had censured as "significant and undue restrictions" on democratic freedoms. Collectively, these incremental assaults on freedom have practically eliminated the historically earned right to public demonstration.

Exploiting Tragedy to Justify Suppression

The latest restrictive measures are being defended by citing last week's terrible anti-Jewish attack on a British mosque. There should be universal agreement that the security of Jewish communities in Britain must be protected. However, employing this horrific incident as a pretext to suppress opposition is not only unrelated to that duty but distorts it.

"If you can't draw the line at genocide, you likely cannot draw the line at democracy," commented a well-known American author, whose words that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Protest

Reflect on Britain's rich history of protest and activism against racism and authoritarianism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to postwar Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s mobilizations against the far-right organization. Many of these historical demonstrators were labeled as extremists in their time, even while they were advocating the freedoms of marginalized groups.

Current Reality

In today's complicated landscape, here's what's actually occurring: The Israeli government – a foreign state – is committing acts that international bodies have described as systematic destruction. Its military actions have led the International Criminal Court to issue legal indictments against Benjamin Netanyahu and his ex-military leader.

Western public opinion has changed significantly against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a large percentage of the public believe Israel has probably committed international law violations. Most people would support a complete ban on arms sales to the state, and back the arrest of Netanyahu.

Silencing Dissent

Having largely lost the argument, Israel's supporters are now exploiting a despicable anti-Jewish attack to attempt to suppress a mass movement against a ethical disaster. The British government seems included in this attempt. Government officials have failed to implement extensive restrictions on Israel and have allowed arms exports to proceed.

People who are protesting against the erasure of Gaza have been labeled as hateful extremists. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a broader crackdown on these protesters until now: very limited protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities little justification to take action.

Dangerous Conflation

Equating Jewish heritage with the policies of the Israeli state is not only cynical but also harmful. The official definition of anti-Jewish prejudice, adopted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately challenged for potentially stifling valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its central illustrations: that "making Jewish people collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've reached a situation where law enforcement can propose that protests criticizing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "inadvertently or intentionally" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have declared that recognition of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "complicit" in supposed mistreatment faced by Jewish communities.

Double Standards

On the same day as the synagogue attack, the Israel's army killed dozens of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – increasing the terrible count from two years of ongoing violence that have taken many thousands of lives. British political leaders and media outlets have barely concealed the minimal importance they attach to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the boldest expressions of discrimination in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already passed a dangerous threshold by banning Palestine Action, a peaceful, human rights-focused activist collective. Thousands of British protesters have been detained, primarily for holding placards opposing mass killing and supporting the proscribed group. Many of those arrested are pensioners; among them a former clergyman and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's not difficult to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, government officials helped vilify pro-Palestinian protests: a former House Speaker suggested that some were "linked with" foreign governments, while the sitting leader described such demonstrations as antisemitic. In taking these actions, they helped legitimize the authoritarian crackdown on such protests – and on freedom of expression in general.

Future Concerns

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be given sweeping powers to control dissent. What might a Reform government do with this repressive toolkit? Our ancestors struggled, endured hardship and died to establish our freedoms. We may ultimately rue how casually we permitted them to slip away.